TRANSCRIPT
INTERVIEWEE: Gary
Oliver (GO)
INTERVIEWERS: David Todd (DT) and David Weisman (DW)
DATE: March 31, 2001
LOCATION: Marfa, Texas
TRANSCRIBER: Robin Johnson
REEL: 2144 and
2145
Please see the Real
Media video record
of reel
2144 and
2145 from our full interview with Mr. Oliver. Please note that
the video
includes roughly 60 seconds of color bars
and sound tone for
technical settings at the outset of the recordings.
Note: boldfaced numbers refer to time codes
for the VHS tape copy of the interview. "Misc." refers to various
off-camera conversation or background noise, unrelated to the interview.
DT: My name’s David Todd. I’m here for the Conservation
History Association of Texas. It’s March 31, 2001, and we’re in Marfa at
the home of Gary Oliver, who has done many things in his life, but I
think some of the things that are most relevant here is he’s been a
political cartoonist and has taken some funny shots at many topics, but
a number of them environmental. And I also wanted to mention that he’s
been involved in some direct activity to try and stop the nuclear waste
dump proposals for West Texas. At this point, I wanted to thank you for
taking the time to talk to us.
0:02:00 - 2144
GO: My pleasure.
DT: Let’s start at the beginning and I’m wondering if you can
tell us what your first introduction was to environmental issues?
0:02:14 - 2144
GO: I’ve—I’ve—my adult life, I’d say I’ve been left of center,
even before I thought about political issues, if I did happen to think
about them. And I wasn’t thinking about them as a young man. I ran a—a
night club in Austin and was thinking more along the lines of music and
parties. Although along with all my friends, I was in Vietnam—Vietnam
demonstrations all of my college years. I went to the University of
Texas from ’65 to ’70, right in the middle of the escalation of the war.
But after I left Austin, I started—I spent some time in South America
and started doing lots of hiking there, getting into more outdoor
activities which has a way of bringing a person into—into
0:03:07 - 2144
thinking about environmental things. The first big issue that hit
home anywhere near me was the—was the states trying to dump nuclear
waste down into the place I eventually settled down here. And they began
almost at the same time that I came here. I was bicycling to Alaska in
1982, after I came back from South America—I’d spent about five years
bumming around South and Central America and—and through a series of
chances, I ended up in Marfa after I finished my tour and it was ’84
when the state came to Hudspeth County the first time trying to put a
nuclear dump in. So the very first cartoon I drew for the newspaper here
was about a nuclear waste dump.
DT: And is that where most of our activity went into fighting
the nuclear waste dump drawing these cartoons, or did you do some
speaking or marching or other kinds of activities?
0:04:05 - 2144
GO: I wasn’t—in the ‘80’s, I wasn’t doing regular political
cartoons. I was trying to market a book about—I’d done about—about
traveling in South America and I found myself in a shack that needed a
lot of work, I found—I found I was having to learn some construction
skills. Something I’d never dealt with. And it was the—it—and the dump
went away. They left—they were run out of their first place in Hudspeth
County. They went to South Texas for a few years and the next time I
heard about a nuclear dump, they were—the state was involved in a
lawsuit filed against them by the county of El Paso, which was resolved
in January of ’91. That was the year that the judge found the state was
out of order in every parameter in trying to site—site a dump against
all its own sitting criteria along the Rio Grande. And that’s when,
that—it’s a—was an odd
0:05:01 - 2144
numbered year, so the Legislature met right after the judge threw the
state out, reacted in pique, not uncommon with the Texas Legislature and
cut them—cut—said they would pass a law putting the dump in Sierra
Blanca or in—then it was Fort Hancock. And instead of fighting them in
Federal court, El Paso cut a deal. El Paso had just spent four million
dollars beating them. And unfortunately decided to caught—cut and run.
And so the state drew a box around Sierra Blanca and that fight began.
They drew a box in which three hundred seventy square miles, that means
by longitude and latitude on a map. They designated in—in—in a House
bill, the only legal place to build a nuclear waste dump in Texas. That
law is still into—in effect. This legislature is—will try to overturn it
so they can dump on somebody else. So, I didn’t get into activism until
the Sierra Blanca end of the—of the nuclear story of Texas. And I think
the first demonstration I actually went into was—was mid-‘90’s.
DT: And what was that demonstration?
0:06:21 - 2144
GO: It was blocking a—blocking an international bridge in Del
Rio. All the—the area along the Rio Grande was up in arms about this
dump because it was sixteen miles from the Rio Grande. It—it—of course,
the people—the—the southern Rio Grande is a—is a very poor area, as is
southern Presidio County. And folks felt rather dumped on before people
talked to them about nuclear waste. So, there were resolutions in almost
every town, every city along the river. All the way to Brownsville,
against the idea of this dump. And Del Rio was particularly vocal about
it. That we were joining hands, blocking the international bridge there
with the mayors of both Acuna and Del Rio. City, county commissioners.
(misc.)
DT: Yes. Okay, well, lets finish going through this sort of
timeline that you had. And then we’ll talk about just your personal
issues there.
0:07:42 - 2144
GO: Sure. Okay.
DT: You were talking about blocking the bridge between Del Rio
and Acuna?
0:07:50 - 2144
GO: Right. I think that was ’96, the beginning of ’96. And
before that, I’d been doing a bit of writing in newspapers. I’d been—I’d
been—I’d drawn so many cartoons on that subject by that time that—that
and the sludge dump that arrived out here in ’92 that my editor
would—would often call me the one issue cartoonist when I walked in. I
would have to—I—I generated nuclear cartoons that had this newspaper’s
name on them but I would send them all over the country to nuclear
groups. Some of them I can—I alter, so I’d—to the Ward Valley people
in—in California, I’d take site-specific cartoons and alter them to—so
that they’d be specific for their site. I’d do the same for people in
other parts of the country. So I’m—many, many nuclear groups use my
stuff around the country. But I hadn’t actually been out doing
demonstrations until that time. I’d just been in a lot of newspapers,
both in writing and in cartooning.
DT: Can you tell us a little bit about the experience of being
in some of these protests?
0:09:05 - 2144
GO: Well, it’s a—it—it’s one of the more fun parts of the—it’s
when everybody—everybody gets together, the energy is high and of
course, if it’s one like that—that one in Del Rio, where even the
authorities of all the—the local towns are with you, that’s a—that’s a
feeling of support you don’t get everywhere. When you demonstrate in
Austin, you’re still pretty far removed from the—the people you need to
reach inside the—the capital dome.
DT: Were there some cases when you protested you got a lot of
opposition and harassment?
0:09:51 - 2144
GO: Well, I wouldn’t say so in—in West Texas—now, in—last
year, I was—I was marching with New Mexico folks down towards the—the
Waste Isolation Pilot Project in Carlsbad and I think one guy threw
something out of a car. There were a few shouts from the odd vehicle
because when you’re in a company town, and I guess when—in Vermont we—we
marched the year before last, I think it was, into Vernon, the town
where their nuclear plant is. Nobody’s throwing anything, or yelling at
you, but you get a—a—a lot of negative letters appear in—in the local
papers because a place where—where a big dump or a nuclear plant is, is
a company town. It’s probably the big employer. And, of
0:10:40 - 2144
course, you’re going to get some resistance from all the people who’s
living comes from that. You know the—I like the Upton Sinclair line a
lot. That—that it’s almost impossible to make a man understand something
if his livelihood depends upon his not understanding it. So the most
opposition is when you walk into a—into a place where people—people view
their jobs as depending on—on this project. And that’s the—that’s what’s
going on in Andrews right now. There’s a—there’s a lot of pressure to
bring in a new industry, and this is the new industry that the powers
that be have decided they wanted to bring in. A lot of forces were
lining up to try and make that happen, and the few people who’ve
organized a group that’s no longer together, they were pressured
heavily. And that, I’m sure, when you talked to Bill Addington, you
heard about how pressure appears in a little town. You know, it might be
that you go into—when you go in to talk about your home or your car loan
in the bank, somebody might drop a little hint in a back room with no
witnesses that—that there might be problems with it, you know. Your—your
employer may have words with you in some very private place—things—and
it may not be a specific threat. It may be something that can be
interpreted as one. But the pressure is somehow felt and people drop out
or don’t—won’t be public. It can—it can be hard to be out front in a
little town.
DT: Given all that pressure, how do you think it was that the
Sierra Blanca nuclear dump, the proposal for it, was defeated?
0:12:41 - 2144
GO: Well, that—that was a seven-year project, from ’91 till
October ’98 when the license was denied. And until the license went
before—went—the licensing process started, that meant the draft license
was accepted, which happened in, I think, it happened in the spring of
’96, it was considered a done deal. Legislators in West Texas told
their—we heard it here from our legislators, that this wasn’t going to
be—be—be defeated. That it was—it had too much momentum behind it. But
when—but over that period of time, these guys—this—this state crew that
was putting the thing together is not the—not the swiftest bunch around.
They made mistake after mistake like the thing we discussed a moment
ago. They’d go to a commissioner’s meeting and refer to the people
living around the dump as receptors. And the commissioner’s jaws would
drop.
DT: This is receptors of radiation?
0:13:46 - 2144
GO: That’s right. But they—they—they’d refer to the number of
receptors instead of human beings who lived around the proposed
facility, which wasn’t going to hurt any of those receptors. They talked
about—they—they just—they had no PR skills, had no people skills. They
were—they were pretty faceless characters, and—and they’d come out and
they’d—they had all the money in the world, of course, to—to make
slides, videos and glossies and they’d show up at commissioners meetings
and all sorts of things and job projections about how much money would
come from these things. And, of course, all of the opposition had—had no
money. But because—because the thing stretched such a long time and
because it had—it had—it attracted the attention of people all over the
country because it fell into—it fell into an environmental justice
parameter
0:14:47 - 2144
because Sierra Blanca is—has a high Mexican-American percentage. It’s
a—it’s an unincorporated town. It has—it’s quite poor. It had no sewer
system. You know, they just put that in since the dump was defeated.
And—and the only projects that were coming in from the time that—that it
was named as the site were coming in through this planning and
implementation fund the utility set up and disbursed through the
legislature to—to a group in Sierra Blanca that had to be set up by a
law. There was no way—they had the problem—without a license, without a
dump, how do you funnel money to the local politicians that you need to
keep on board? The only reason they’re with you is money. Nobody—nobody
is—is carrying picket signs for a nuclear waste dump because
0:15:44 - 2144
they think it’s such a great thing and
it’s needed. They see financial reward in it. Whereas the people on the
other side are motivated by something other than financial pressures. So
they had—they passed a law that—that would allow money to be funneled
through these guys into community projects. They built a park—is, I
think a laughing stock among locals. Bill says it’s the lowest point in
town and floods. They built a clinic that never opened. They built a
number of things. They ran some money through and—and just as soon as
the place was named, the same spring that the—the ranch for the—the—the
nuclear waste dump was being bought, they were buying it, mind you,
before they had a license. They also had proposed before they had a
license in ’96, I think, they were ready to build a freeway interchange.
And somehow that didn’t go through. That—
0:16:50 - 2144
that’s how much of a done deal they
thought this stuff was. So these guys were, they were—they were pretty
confident and they were pretty overbearing to the folks in the town and
just as soon as they named that site, the sludge company shows up in
Sierra Blanca, within a month of the buying of the ranch of the state
taking it—taking a strong step of buying property toward putting up a
dump. Well, Merco, the sludge hauler, was one of the three companies
hauling New York sewage sludge out. New York had been under court order
to cease and desist dumping it at sea by July 1st, 1992.
They’d been doing it since the ‘20’s and they had this dead zone
offshore. And they’d been trying—one company had set up between New
Jersey folks and some Oklahoma folks. They tried in Oklahoma and people
there took them to their Supreme Court. They were losing in the
0:17:53 - 2144
Supreme Court when the Sierra Blanca
nuclear site was named. And so they hired an ex-water commissioner, one
of the boards that preceded the TNRCC [Texas Natural Resources
Conservation Commission] to—to use his clout to see if they could get a
permit to—to spread sewage sludge. I think it was a registration, not
even a permit. And he got it through the water commission in
twenty-three days. Now, the head of the water commission, Jesus Garza,
told the Houston Chronicle that he’d been ordered to
expedite that—that—that application because from somewhere above him
because of a million, one point five million dollar grant that Merco had
given to Texas Tech to set up a sludge research team. So, you have to
figure that if Marfa wanted to spread its own sewage sludge,
twenty-three days would not happen. You’d be
0:18:56 - 2144
looking at months, probably six
months. Maybe—you’d be looking at a much longer time and that’s
for—would be for us to spread our own miserable, little non-industrial
sewage sludge. These guys were talking about two hundred tons a day,
coming from New York from—from lots of heavy industry. They—what they do
with the stuff up there is they cook it in what they call a digester.
They get it hot to kill the bacteria and they run it through a filter.
They criticized us for saying that everything was still in that sludge,
you know, that went down the drain was coming to Texas. And they pointed
out it went through a filter. And yeah it goes through a big filter. The
filter doesn’t do much for lead, for cadmium, for mercury, for petroleum
products for no end of things. And then you seal this stuff into these
cars and they take them down—into these containers—they’d take them down
to cars on the docks I think in Queens. I’ve got an article somewhere
about the complaints in Queens about the stench on the docks there
before
0:20:01 - 2144
they ship it across the river and put
it on—put it on trains in New Jersey and send it down to Texas. That was
the—that was the operation that Michael Moore’s television show,
TV Nation, did a—did a segment on and—and Merco, the sludge
hauler, sued them for that. Sued them for libel. And we had a—we had a
five-day court—court trial in Pecos, Texas, ninety miles from here over
that that was the subject of a cover story in the Texas Observer,
and they, a jury of West Texans convicted Sony TriStar and I think so
they were the—and Hugh Kaufman, the EPA whistle blower who brought down
Reagan’s first EPA hit. He’d been called the hardest guy to fire in
Washington after—after the protections they gave him—after he—he brought
down that person. But—but we had a trial in Pecos in this little
declining West Texas town. Lots of closed up storefronts, but a
0:21:11 - 2144
gigantic courthouse because of Lucius
Bunton. The judge came originally from Marfa, who’s the senior judge in
the western—western district court in Texas. He had the—had the pull to
get this big courthouse built in a little declining town and it just so
happened the fall before that the networks had—were—were doing these
fleecing of America segments. Each network had something along that line
and they had all pilloried this—this courthouse as an outrageous
expenditure of federal money. And so a few months later, into this—into
the judge’s courtroom, comes Sony TriStar as a libel defendant. Michael
Moore took the stand in this case, something quite a happening in little
Pecos, Texas. And the—and Hugh Kaufman, the—the EPA whistle blower who
was on the tape, he’d said that—he’d made the comment that the fish in
New York are being protected, the people in New York are being
protected, the people in Texas are being poisoned. Something is rotten
in Texas. So, anyway, that my digression into Merco.
DT: No, I’m glad you put in your vote and I might segue into
talking about Mike Moore and the press’s coverage of these waste dumps
and I thought this might be a good introduction to look at some of your
cartoons that have lampooned a lot of these misadventures for years.
DW: Can you, before we get into the specific cartoons, what I
find interesting is you are going on about cadmium, lead, you have to
become a scientist even though that’s not your background and then, you
have all these very depressing, these all very gloomy things. How in
your mind does it got from that to a cartoon? Where do you find,
dedicated to the movement, find humor when a lot of activists tend to
be, even on your own side, probably a little on the gloomy and serious
side. How did you…?
0:23:17 - 2144
GO: They—there are those. But I’ve always found humor in—in
most things. That’s just—I’ve done cartoons since I was a kid and I
think of things. I’ve always thought that’s a great way to both to
explain an issue and to do criticism. And as far as newspapers, it just
so happened I had a soapbox when—when this thing occurred. I had—I had
West Texas newspapers, I’ve drawn for Hudspeth County newspaper, for
instance, since the naming of the Sierra Blanca belt. They saw—they saw
my cartoons in other papers and called me. That’s hundred and fifty
miles from here, Dell City.
DT: The Hudspeth County Herald?
0:24:00 - 2144
GO: Yes, I’m their cartoonist. And at one time or the other
I’d done cartoons for lots of little West Texas things. And I’ve sent
them off to other papers over the years and now I’ll draw in journals
like Z or High Country News, or—and, of
course, the Observer.
DT: Texas Observer?
0:24:16 - 2144
GO: Texas Observer in Austin, yeah. And then
many, many environmental groups. Some have money to pay and some don’t.
But I—I always have looked—I—I see cartoons as a way to get people to
follow an issue. Because that’s always been the battle with
environmental things. They don’t cook. This week, for example, how much
have you read in the newspaper about twenty thousand police mobilized in
Germany? To run along beside—run alongside the train that’s carrying
nuclear waste, cutting the—the—the protesters who are chaining
themselves to every—to the track all the way along. Twenty thousand
police. How big a—what—what kind of news would that be if that was
happening here? That’s what happens when you move in high-level waste.
Something our government is—ah—is about to start. If—if Bush, as is
expected, signs the Mobile Chernobyl Bill that is likely to come up
this—this spring, the one that will start moving all the high-level
waste from all the reactors in the United States to Nevada, where they
can’t get a license for their dump either. So they’re going to put it in
a parking lot up on top of the ground until, you know, until they can
get a license to put it underground. Clinton vetoed it last year. But
Bush has said he would sign it. So it will be another one of those—we
seem to have some horror passing every week in the early part of the
Bush Administration.
DW: As an example of that, let’s say come six months from now
they actually decide to put this on and you know there are Americans
here that will go and chain themselves to the tracks. Knowing that is
happening that week, I’d ask you to improvise like a musician, but how,
if it’s possible to explain, how would you work that into humor? Would
you put being an Amtrak joke with the train? How would…?
0:26:10 – 2144
GO: Actually, if you were chained to the track, if you were
one of those guys out there, don’t you think you’d be cracking jokes to
the guy next to you? What would you be doing? I can’t imagine not
getting into a camaraderie with humor in something like that. We were
certainly were doing it when we were marching—ah—when we are in a march
or any kind of—any kind of blockade. There’s always going to be humor in
those. And—and there’s—there’s going to be some way to turn that
situation into a gag. I can’t think of one right now on the spot, for
the train coming along. But I—I know though that everybody reads the
cartoon, you know? It may—if I put some my—granted are wordy enough that
a few people probably pass them along. But if I—if I got a one panel
cartoon with a four or five line cut in the—in the balloon, everybody is
going to read it. They may not all like it. But I’m going to make cute
little characters in there. And they’re going to make, they’re
going—they’re going to take, quite possibly, if it’s nuclear issues,
something some politician or—or waste dumper has said, and they’re going
to—they’re going ratchet it one step beyond whatever the guy said. And
they’re going to show why it’s ridiculous. The person laughing at that
joke has agreed with me without—without perhaps understanding that—that
he’s reached a point of agreement on it.
DT: Will you tell us some of the ridiculous things you’ve
drawn about? Maybe you can start with his t-shirt.
0:27:51 – 2144
GO: Oh this was for—this was a cartoon for the—for the folks
who were fighting the PanTex operation, you know, where they disassemble
warheads.
DT: That’s in Amarillo?
0:28:07 – 2144
GO: Just outside Amarillo. I think they’re—they’re right
across the gate from the PanTex gates. That’s a scary thing if you think
of—think of not only are you there in whatever protective gear you get
into to—to pull out those triggers—disassemble a warhead with lots of
plutonium in it, but for the safe—in case of an inadvertent explosion
they work under what are called Gravel Gerties, which are tons of gravel
suspended by a trap door above them. So the slightest—if there’s a
concussion of any kind all that buries the whole site. What do you think
the stress level is? And there’s no question that those guys are over
the (inaudible). They fight about it at Andrews. Because with the
aqui—aquifer shrinking has—has—irrigations has done to them what we fear
big cities taking our water will do to us out here. Their aquifer (?).
DT: Please tell us about some of these cartoons you’ve drawn
over the years.
Misc.
0:29:17 – 2144
GO: Okay. Well, it would be—here’s a nuclear one, at the
start(?), which of course has a couple of—a couple of little devils
discussing leaks from nuclear dumps. You don’t want me to read it do
you?
DT: You don’t have to.
0:29:33 – 2144
GO: Okay. Because that’s a big issue of the—all the dumps that
leaked. And, of course, the—when the dumpers appear, they’re—they’re
always giving us some sort of the gee whiz, state of the art talk on why
their dump won’t, even though all the others have. And that’s—that’s the
issue of geologic disposal. It has—it has a hundred percent failure
record. And it has—it doesn’t matter about the rainfall. Texas—the—the
law we are about to be fighting in the Texas Legislature draws the line
now, instead of a box around a—a community, it—it draws a water line.
It’ll only be legal to dump west of the twenty—in area of less than
twenty-six inches of rainfall, which means West Texas. But Beatty,
Nevada, one of the six nuclear dumps that’s now closed, had four inches
of rain fall and—and radioisotopes were found over three hundred fifty
feet down and off the
0:30:37 - 2144
reservation. Nobody know show this stuff travels. But they know it
seems to leak consistently. So the leaking dumps is a—one of the angles
you can hit repeatedly in nuclear waste. Corrupt politicians is another.
They’re—they’re—they’re gobbledlygook spoken by—by folks using words
like receptors. The—or—for instance, the—the industry term for—they have
three grades of accidents, three classes at a—at a nuclear power plant.
The lowest one is called an unusual event. That’s because that looks a
lot better in headlines than nuclear accident at local reactor. The—the
opposition, of course, has it’s own set of terms for some of them. As I
said, I call them droids. But they refer to the people, I believe,
actually the industry who uses this one. The folks that work in
contaminated zones who come in as temp workers in places that are too
hot for them to
0:31:42 - 2144
use their highly skilled people. They
don’t want them to get their life dose, so they bring in temps. And
they’re called sponges in the industry. So here have then another issue
of nuclear waste, is transportation. That’s what’s going on in Germany
right now. When you start moving the trucks across the country, or the
trains, people start reacting. In 1997, the German farmers on the way to
Gorleben were chaining their tractors together across the roads. They
were actually tunneling under their own highways so that the highways
wouldn’t support the weight of the trucks. And these weren’t—these
weren’t hippy demonstrators. These were—these were town officials.
These—these were professional people from the little towns. Students
barricaded their own—them—their own schoolhouses to stop the police from
using them f—as barracks. The cops had to break the doors down. And then
the city cut the water and power off. The whole part
0:32:41 - 2144
of the country was against it’s
government. It had—it played a big part in the election of the current
prime minister who—who came in on an ending nuclear power platform and
is now backtracking somewhat. Anyway, transportation is another issue.
That it’s unsafe on the roads and it endangers people far, far from
the—far, far from the place that the waste is—is generated. And the
power plants and it’s eventually dumped. When Susan Currie, Health
Landers and I went to Vermont in—in 1998 to oppose the compact that
would bring Vermont’s nuclear waste down here, one—that was a big part
of it. We followed the proposed waste route up there. Twenty four
hundred miles. And we took
0:33:35 - 2144
note where the road was under construction, seemed dangerous, took
note of truck accidents we’d see along the way. So we could tell the
people at each end. And we even wrote letters to newspapers along the
way to tell them what—what might be on their highway. George Bush said
that the trucks might not be marked to discourage terrorists, which is
another comforting thought. I’d drawn cartoons about—about supermarket
and ice cream trucks and the like. The—the—the thing Steven Spielberg
did in Close Encounters of the Third Kind, using
commercial trucks to ship—ship toxic stuff so the public won’t know
what’s on the highways. The danger, of course, is—other than accidents,
trucks leak too. They’re not completely radiation tight. And if you
happen to be invalid, elderly, or especially pregnant and you’re held up
in traffic alongside one of these or driving next to it for a long time,
you’re getting a dose, you know? That may—may come back to haunt your
child later on. Now this one is a recent cartoon relating to
0:34:52 – 2144
the—the California energy crisis. And
it’s self-explanatory I think. And that has—that has to do with nukes as
well, because when California deregulated, they gave a—a boatload of
money to the—the utilities with nuclear power plants. I think it was
just under thirty billion. The same—which utilities then divested
themselves of their—their generating facilities, often to their parent
companies, and—and the money took off too. Those are the same utilities
that are howling bankrupt now. The ones that just got this
0:35:27 - 2144
massive infusion. When—when they
give—when one of these bailouts, one of these pay off the nuclear plant
deregulation events happens—and it’s—we’re about to get it next year—it
appears as a new line on—on rate payers bills. It was originally called
stranded costs to pay off the utilities for investments that were
supposed to take thirty years to—to pay themselves off. But I would
imagine that there are some other terms being used now because that
one’s been printed in too many places. And that’s a sure sign that
they’ll start changing it. As they did sludge to biosolids. We figured
out what that was. And sometimes I draw for groups in the Northwest or
in Canada who are dealing with forestry issues. And this was drawn
during the—the—during the headwaters fight that Californians would be
familiar with. Of course, we had—we played our part in it in that some
Texans were in—in the Maxim Company that is trying to—to—to take out
some of the old growth. And John Connelly was sitting on the board when
he died, I believe. So I—I draw en—en—and then endangered species issues
the same. Although, of course, we have—we have this in—in our areas as
well. We have bears that just returned to Big Bend National Park after
being gone for over fifty years. They were all shot. And eagles
0:37:16 - 2144
nearly disappeared from the Big Bend.
We have a few left. But they were hunted down in the forties. And of
course, we live in a—in an area where property rights is a big—is a big
touchstone for a lot of people. And—and Endangered Species Act is, of
course, considered negatively by folks who—who support property rights
often. Not everybody. And—but I think—I have hopes for the future on
that. And I think water is perhaps one of the inroads. Now you can—water
used to be a big divider too. Of course all the environmentalists didn’t
want it all used up, didn’t want it polluted. And were unhappy with the
Law of Capture because the law in Texas is still the law it’s—the
Supreme Court decided for Clay Williams and Son in the early fifties
which is, whatever your pump can
0:38:26 - 2144
pump out of the ground on your
property is yours to do with it as you please. Now, though, we have
cities that are water hungry. And cities can take phenomenal amounts of
water just—just thirty-five miles from Marfa is a—is a ranch, that was a
failed agricultural project that has twenty wells that—that are
extremely deep. They were made to—to do the revolving irrigation wheels.
And these are the big ones, the—the half-mile dia—half-mile radius jobs.
You know, it seems crazy, agriculture in a desert. But it’s sitting on a
big bolson of water, Ryan bolson. That’s why the bought it. They tried
it there. And El Paso saw that as a water ranch. And bought the ranch,
which had proven—it hadn’t made it as an agriculture, but El Paso was
looking for—it’s aquifer is about to run out in twenty-five years.
Juarez’s water is going to run out much sooner than that. And so they
bought this and—and started investigating building a pipeline, start
piping huge amounts of water from here. And then they bought another
ranch near Van Horn, Wild horse Ranch, to do the same. And there’s some
land near Dell City that they are looking at as well. El Paso is looking
at—at mining rural water, much as L.A. was how many, seventy something
years ago.
DT: Do you think this might bring in some of the property
rights advocates?
0:40:07 – 2144
GO: Well, you can already see—we have—now we have an
underground water conservation district. Here we have a number of
ranchers involved with that. And when our regional plan—everybody can
see that the law of capture isn’t going to work against a city. You can
no longer say you—you—you—if everybody has unlimited use, then there are
some users that are so big that they can ru—they can drain everyone
else’s aquifer. So it just is not in the rancher’s self-interest to
continue being for everyone
0:40:46 - 2144
having unlimited use of water as long as a city has the same rights
as a person does. And that’s a—that was a big line to cross. That’s been
holy ground. The Law of Capture in Texas. Now they’re talking about the
head of the regional board, whose a rancher, who has talked about
reasonable use as a—as a standard. And of course that means some kind of
board has to decide what reasonable use is. Now that—I won’t get into
water law and the state, that’s a—that’s a—that’s a—that’s a big issue.
The last two legislatures have dealt with it. And—and there are water
districts all over the state now. A lot of them were—were killed, you
probably know, in the last legislature. They were—they were—they were
made—they were watered down so to speak, by a guy named Buster Brown
running for the Senate Natural Resources Committee. He’d passed a
comprehensive water law—water bill, Senate Bill 1, I think, two
legislatures ago. But it had a loophole. His bill, of course, was to
help the big folks, industry and cities. And—and the loophole that
underground water conservation districts, which could be a countywide
0:42:03 - 2144
group, could—could form with enabling
legislation and could regulate transport out of district. Well that’s
not what the big guys want. They don’t want Presidio County to be able
to have a board of local guys telling whoever buys a ranch here that
they have to come before them to have transport, which means pipeline,
water out of the district, tell them that are okay. You know, that’s not
the idea. They want to come in and take all the water they want and with
no local input. Because, of course, locals are going to say, no you
don’t have to drain an aquifer to trash it. All you have to do is lower
the level
0:42:46 – 2144
enough so that suspended minerals in
pockets come down into it. And the—the quality of water can change. We
have wonderful water here. We have ancient water. And El Paso is
proposing, I think they said fifteen thousand-acre feet a year when
there’s a little over—over ten times, maybe many times more than the
recharge. So, of course, they are saying they are going to kill the
aquifer. And they may change the—the—the guys in this case will show you
a map showing that, that aquifer had—there were all kinds of dikes
underground that make—that show that that aquifer is totally unconnected
to the one under us, even though it’s thirty-five miles away. But I’m a
little suspicious of the finds in that. We’ve noticed that when somebody
comes along and wants to set up a nuclear waste dump, a geologically
based one in which they’re going to dig a hole and
0:43:45 - 2144
let—let some kind of formation contain
the waste and prevent it from getting to the water where—however deep it
may be, that what they do—and they’ve got to show in court or before the
environmental agency is that—that it’s impermeable. Whatever it is, it’s
impermeable. Impermeable clay is what they used in Sheffield, Illinois,
what they told them before they polluted their lake, their groundwater
for the dump that was there trashed it. But if someone wants your water,
they want to tell you the opposite. They want to tell you the recharge
is great on that groundwater.
DT: You can’t do it both ways.
0:44:25 – 2144
GO: You can’t have it both ways, right. But there is a
scientist who will tell you anything you need—there’s—somebody’s got a
Ph.D. who’ll tell you that a cigarette won’t give you cancer. There are
guys—there are guys who will do it. They’ll tell you anything the
industry hires them to tell you. They’ll tell you that they stood up—in
court…
(misc.)
DT: I was going to ask you if you could show us more things
that are a little bit hard to believe, a little bit of a stretch and a
joke.
0:44:53 – 2144
GO: Well, the next one is food issues.
DT: Okay.
0:44:56 – 2144
GO: I was a—well I was the resident beacon. I think I’ve—we
have so many artists in Marfa that maybe one or two others. But this is
cattle town. Giant was filmed here. This is James Dean’s last stop
before his accident. And—and so vegetarians aren’t—it’s—it’s not looked
on—it can look on a bit askance here and there. And, of course, last
year the government okayed the irradiation of meat. This is just a gag
about that. They—they’re already getting a little negative press though.
And—and it seems that—they say
0:45:35 - 2144
there—there are some irrational fears the public seems to have in
using the word irradiation with food products. Irradiation in general,
but with food products particularly. You don’t see it on your spice
cans. They’ve irradiated spices for years in the supermarket. And—and so
they were proposing a new name. I—I’m sure I’ll be doing cartoons about
it. The one that was favored in the last article that I read was cold
pasteurization. As—kind of catchy, huh? So there are food issues. Of
course, I draw—I draw BGH [Bovine Growth Hormone] cartoons. I draw
genetic engineering…
DT: (inaudible)
0:46:18 - 2144
GO: Yeah. I draw any kind of—any kind of food additive
cartoon.
DT: Do you find that you use like the personification of
animals as you go through this as well? Let’s say you are going to do an
irradiated food cartoon on cold pasteurization, I mean, would you mock
the scientist, would you have the voices come out of the animal?
0:46:37 - 2144
GO: Both probably. I’ll do it all. But I do a lot of animals
or roly-poly, Mr. Potato Head characters because I come—my background
was—was animal funnies. The—the stuff I loved as a kid were the Uncle
Scrooge Comics. I think the best comic strip ever drawn was Pogo by Walt
Kelly. I’m—I’m a big fan of cutesy characters and animals in particular.
I don’t—I don’t tend to use animals all the time, but I draw humans so—I
draw humans that don’t look much like humans. I don’t know how I’d—I’ll
hit the cold pasteurization angle yet. This is a general earth—Earth Day
cartoon, just mocking that’s it’s by now commercialized, general-purpose
environmental cartoon. And then, here’s another general purpose. This
was an election year, of course, when it hits the economy stupid was
the—was being used again as a line. So here’s a simple take on it. I
think that’s…
DT: You are showing us to us, we’re interested in some of the
other creative work you’ve done on behalf of conservation and I
understand that you’ve taken up song writing in and playing. And I was
wondering if you could play a few songs for us?
(misc.)
0:48:16 - 2144
GO: You know I was a party in the Sierra Blanca hearings? You
know about that?
DT: Yeah, please tell us.
0:48:23 - 2144
GO: That’s—that when the—when the Sierra Blanca fight did come
to a head—did—and the—the process through the TNRCC is that a draft
license is submitted. I think they submitted nineteen of them. This
bunch of characters that I started telling you about it before. You can
tell that in the license itself, you have nineteen title pages, I think
it is. It’s just under twenty and so they were—they were rejected, the
first eighteen of them. And in ’96 that was accepted. The sixty thousand
page license application, twenty-eight volumes. This is a—a—if you
wonder why the average person doesn’t get into—into contesting
something, I think I looked at my Encyclopedia Britannica at the time
and—and it was—it might have made ten thousand pages. This is a massive
piece of work, full of charts, diagrams, full of very difficult to read
studies that these guys had been working on, some of the stuff, the
general things, for example, they’d carried from site to site. And
0:49:33 - 2144
they—this was—this was the equivalent of you as a student being able
to submit your—your—your test paper nineteen times and have it redlined
by the teacher until you finally manage to get it right. That’s what
these guys were doing. And they got the draft license approved; I think
it was March, ’96, which starts the appeal process. Then—then all those
who aren’t happy with that draft license being accepted, get to—get to
petition for hearings. And all the activists got on the stick then
and—and I think we had—we had many hundred, I forget how many—five or
six hundred, at least, applications for hearings. So many that they
had—they had multiple hearings at El Paso, Sierra Blanca and Alpine. We
had so many in our counties that they had their own hearing here.
DT: These are public hearings? These are contested case
hearings.
0:50:32 - 2144
GO: Right, and the public hearing is—it—of course, is
recorded. You have a couple of administrative law judges, in this case a
couple, show up, they take testimony from everybody and it’s part of the
record, but there’s no guarantee that anybody ever looks at this
testimony again. It lets everybody vent. And, at this same time, you get
to apply for party status and that means you have to show how you’re
affected by the proj—proposed project in a way the general public isn’t.
And a number of—then you have another hearing, a smaller hearing, in
which the judges determine who actually—who qualifies for that. And the
peop—if anyone—if no one qualifies, then the license is accepted. It
0:51:17 - 2144
changes from a draft license to a permanent license. But if there—if
anyone is a party—is accepted as a party, then you enter into a hearing
process, a contested case hearing. This is one of the things that
somebody always proposes doing away with every year in the Legislature.
And we had, I believe, twenty-one parties. We had two states of Mexico
applied, they were both rejected. They didn’t want any deep pockets to
hire legal staffs in this case. But the city of Juarez was accepted,
Greenpeace, Mexico, made it in. A number of environmental groups, folks
you’d expect, like the Sierra Club made it in. Some groups you wouldn’t
have heard of. And then a number of individuals, and I’m one of them,
from this town. I—we had to go a hundred miles from here to testify at a
hearing and—and it’s—of course, the agency was arguing that no one that
lives further than ten miles away should be affected.
DT: How did you get standing?
0:52:23 - 2144
GO: I don’t know. It’s up to the judge. I came—I argued
that—that a hundred miles is not very far for radiation to come for—if
you’re talking about air and water transport, there’s a—I’m downstream.
I’m often downwind. We have west winds a lot in West Texas. And if you
want to see how far pollutants, how far matter in the air is carried,
just go down and lo—in Big Bend to the Visitor Center and take a look at
that—at the pollution display they have and where they say that
pollution is coming from. It’s coming from Louisiana, the Gulf Coast of
Texas, crossing over at Monterrey and San Luis Potosi. And, of course,
Carbon one and two, which are far—it’s a much greater
0:53:11 - 2144
distance than the little hundred miles I’m talking about. But they
accepted me; they accepted a number of other individuals and my county.
I’m terrifically proud of—for—county actually voted money. We’re one of
the poorest counties in the state. We had, I think that year, thirty
percent unemployment, something really high. And they voted a few
thousand dollars. We didn’t have much, but—but they fought it—they—our
judge and—our county judge and our county attorney went to Sierra Blanca
that day. The
0:53:46 - 2144
county attorney, Teresa Todd, I
thought she had the best presentation of the day. She had—she had a
tourism director there talking about how he’d been—he’d been on the
phone to tourist agencies all over the state and whether or not this
issue had been brought up by tourists who wanted to come to the Big Bend
and he had—he had information that it—he was hearing about it from other
parts of the state. We had a guy who’s brought—whose job here was to
bring in—bring in industry who just, a little bit before, had people fly
in and wanted to know what all that pollution was that they saw down in
Big Bend on their way in, and turned around and left, saying they were
coming out here because it was supposed to be a clean place. So you had
exactly what these guys listened to. Economic arguments. And then she
even had the—the—she called us the next contiguous county downstream
from Hudspeth, which you know, there’s a corner where the counties
have—meet at a right angle on the river, Presidio, Jeff Davis and you
could argue Culberson, I don’t think so. Jeff Davis, Presidio and
Hudspeth meet and so the—the opposition argued that we weren’t cont—we
weren’t contiguous, that Jeff Davis was in between.
0:55:02 - 2144
And she had a witness there to counter
that. She had a guy who had been a policeman when there had been a
corpse found right at that point and he called all the three counties to
found out who had jurisdiction. And Jeff Davis told him they had no
jurisdiction on the Rio Grande. She—I was—I was—I was—I was very
impressed. She went to Washington to argue against the compact. I can
tell you, we don’t send local officials to Washington for much.
(misc.)
0:55:42 - 2144
GO: I mean, she’s been talking to the other library people.
That’s too bad. We’re going to pay you anyway, Rick, if they don’t.
Well, I’ll still have to get down there and put a sign on the door,
people are driving in from three counties for this concert. You know.
That’s what’s bad about it.
DT: We usually ask a few questions to close, and I thought in
your case, we’d probably ask you to play a few songs afterwards if you
don’t mind?
0:56:12 - 2144
GO: Uh huh.
DT: The first question we usually ask is, what do you think
the major environmental challenges are? You’ve pointed out a number of
them in just in what you told us and shown us in your cartoons, but are
there…?
0:56:28 - 2144
GO: In the world?
DT: Well, maybe just for West Texas or things you are most
intimately involved with. The top two or three challenges.
0:56:41 - 2144
GO: Well, the first, the one I’m most intimately associated
with is nuclear, of course. And it’s—it’s at a crisis point this year.
You’re—you’re seeing one end of it in Germany. I just came from New
Mexico this—meeting with activists there this weekend, where they say
they have all—they have the whole chain cycling. Mine uranium there,
they have Los Alamos, they have reactors there and they have the
dumpsites. Everything is in that state. And their own senator, Pete
Domenici has just stated how we need to start relying more on nuclear
power. We need to encourage more of it. And, of course, you know
there’ve been no plants opened in this stat—in this country that were
ordered after the Three Mile Island event in 1979. There’ve been plants
that were opened afterwards but they were ordered before. That—that and
then, Chernobyl after it killed the nuclear industry in this country.
You can—you—if you—you try to build plants in a country where the people
have some kind of free speech and right of assembly, they’re going to be
out in the streets, as they are in Germany right now. You can do it in
China,
0:57:55 - 2144
sure. You can do it in North Korea, yeah. And that’s exactly what
our—our presidents have done. Every president since Reagan, since Three
Mile Island, in other words, has gone to other countries and sold GE
reactors, Bechtel nuclear technology, Westinghouse reactors. GE, by the
way owns NBC and Westinghouse, at least did own CBS, if you wonder why
some of this doesn’t make the news. So Clinton went to China, sold a lot
of reactors. Well, in all those deals, we get the waste. They’re not
going to leave weapons grade waste, the plutonium 239 that comes out of
commercial reactors. They’re not going to leave that in—in—in other
hands. And so the U.S. has got—once it does get a
0:58:43 - 2144
high level dump, is going to be taking
waste from everywhere. It’s going to come—it’s going to come through
every straight; it’s going to come through the Panama Canal. It’s going
to come—countries now, even little Caribbean Islands send their little
coast guard boats out to try and steer boats with waste, nuclear waste,
away from their islands. You read this stuff in BBC news; you don’t read
it much here. It’s a big concern and when you get away from the U.S. and
it may become a big one here when they—when the stuff hits the roads.
That’s certainly a big issue. The reason they need a dump, at least for
commercial reactor waste, is because they—they’re running out of time on
the first generation of reactors. If you start talking about twenty
years with no nuclear reactors, well, they’re thirty year licenses and
so they’re running out of time. And they’re now—they’re now talking up
in the northeast about—about adding, about renewing those licenses.
And—and a dump, however primitive, however leaky, will be touted as
the—the answer, finally the answer has come to what to do with the
waste. They’ll call it high
0:59:56 - 2144
tech, put some name on it, and use it
just as justification to build a new generation of reactors.
West—Westinghouse has already designed one that’s can be opened fast.
The new push is to come up with one that doesn’t have a twenty year
licensing and building window. They want one you can get through in
three years because the movement doesn’t have time to build. They’ve
discovered if you give them time, like seven years, say at Sierra
Blanca, by the time you reach the final stages, people are out
demonstrating. They’re blocking bridges; they’re having circus parades
down Congress Avenue in Austin. You know, Bonnie Raitt is showing up in
town to do a concert for them. You’ve
1:00:38 - 2144
got to get it quick. If you can site
the thing, the dynamics change dramatically once the thing is open. Once
you have a nuclear plant in a town then the people who can’t—can’t abide
living near one either make accommodations or move away. And the people
who move in are probably moving in to work. It’s something related to
this new project. So the local dynamics are going to change. As far as
leaks go, of course, the industry will always deny them. On the stand in
the Sierra Blanca hearings, the head of the state agency testified that
there were no long lasting health effects from Chernobyl. The industry
still claims there were only thirty-one deaths, the guys in the
explosion and the fire. That’s the international nuclear industry. They
don’t accept cancer. They think the only way waste can kill you is if a
drum of the stuff falls on you and breaks you in half or you drown in a
vat of it.
DT: What’s your advice for the next generation?
(misc.)
[End of Reel #144]
(misc.)
DT: Let’s pick up where we left off on the first tape. I
think, you’d been telling us about one of the outstanding problems we
all face is the nuclear issue. And I’m curious if you have any advice
for the next generation of people who might be concerned and want to do
something to respond to the nuclear threat?
0:00:27 - 2145
GO: Well, the nuclear threat, the threat to the atmosphere
the—the—in the last week or two, the threat of Bush’s CO2
reversal, the fact that we’re the only—we’re—our country is going to the
next—the equivalent of the Kyoto Meeting with no national policy and our
Environmental Protection Agency had asked him what she should do. She
doesn’t know what brief to take and the government has no brief to give
her except that she shouldn’t offend the oil and coal industry
apparently. You have that; you have the threat to the food supply
through—through genetically modified things. Fertilizers like sludge,
hormones, no—no end of things. And—and—and globalization that allows us
0:01:17 - 2145
to—to import foods from places like Mexico grown with things like DDT
that we’ve shipped them from Monsanto, based in St. Louis here. You
know, and when I was in Vermont, they were celebrating up there the
rejuvenation, the rejuvenation of the peregrine falcon, it was
endangered there or was threatened the way it is here. And we often have
parts of Big Bend closed down, the nesting area, part of the south rim
and part of the Santa Elena Canyon are closed to tourist’s part of the
year so the falcon has a chance. Well, ours is in trouble and one reason
might be that right across the river, you can grow with DDT, which is
what caused the problem in the first place. Whereas the
0:02:03 - 2145
northern—in Vermont, their falcons are
doing great. Canada isn’t accepting DDT from Monsanto. So the fact that
globalization is a—is a—as it’s currently constituted, is a—is a
terrific threat because it means products can pass borders, money can
pass through borders, but people, if they happen to be low income
are—are stopped flat at borders. Globalization is about—is about a
select group of things being able to pass freely from one place to
another. And it’s about tribunals being set up to overcome pesky laws
that individual nations set up. If we choose to not import whale meat,
let’s say, or—or slave labor-produced goods, well, from somebody who’s a
member of wh—of an international trade group that we’re in, they can
take it to whatever tribunal overseas that and those tribunals never
find against business, against commerce. They’ll call that a restraint
of trade.
DT: What sort of advice to you give to people who are up
against these long odds?
0:03:19 - 2145
GO: Well they’re always long odds. They’re always long odds.
And—but we just showed in 1998, you can beat them. And everybody always
tells you you can’t. They told us that, they—they—you, of course, many
people lose but not everybody loses. And…
DT: Can you maybe show this to illustrate what you are talking
about?
0:03:42 - 2145
GO: Yeah, this is, everyone’s back yard is a
publishing—publication of what used to be the Citizen’s Clearinghouse
for Hazardous Waste. Now it’s CHEJ, I think. It was started by Lois
Marie Gibbs who was driven out of Love Canal by the pollution there. And
it’s about—it’s an organizing handbook they send to the people all
around the country. And as you see, Sierra Blanca was a national issue.
And it was a rallying point. Now when—when I find myself in another
state and I—I say that I live a hundred miles below Sierra Blanca, the
minute the word Sierra Blanca come out, people often cheer if I’m in a
group of environmentalists. So I would tell people that you never want
to listen to the folks who tell you you can’t beat the odds. That that’s
just not true.
DW: Do you pay a terrible price for that, as in the case of
(inaudible), you know, sometimes you do?
0:04:48 - 2145
GO: Well, yeah. The Sierra Blanca is a—is a strange site.
You’ll hear in a couple of places that—the article I sent you that
Texas Monthly wrote on Bill Addington and Susan Curry and—and
me was about the different reception we got in our—our respective
communities. That—that Bill—that it was always controversial in Sierra
Blanca because there was money being distributed in Sierra Blanca and a
lot of people were intimidated. There was a power structure that was
supporting a dump, there was no money spread here, though our county
judge at the time did say he was asked by the—one of the agency—state
agency fellows if—if getting some of those planning and implementation
funds might help here. And bless his heart, he showed him the door. So
the—and—and the difference in the two communities is that both Susan and
I were given Chamber of Commerce awards in our town, for fighting the
Sierra Blanca dump. They made both of us Citizen of the Year. And you
don’t—in a little West Texas cattle towns, you just don’t ever hear
of—of awards being given for environmental reasons but then—not Chamber
of Commerce awards.
DW: How about reprisals from the companies’ whose names you
plaster the cartoons with?
0:06:19 - 2145
GO: I—I’m not big time enough. I’m not on their radar screen.
The—the nuclear fellows knew me. As a matter of fact, I find that
when—when in Vermont, for instance, I—on that march I was pulled off it
one day to go to a hearing with some people who had called—had filed a
complaint or asked a question that called a hearing with the—the Vermont
Nuclear Authority and representatives of Vermont Nuclear—Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Plant. So they dragged—they wanted the Texans to come in
and respond to the stuff that their state administrators were saying.
And they—all the guys from the plant came up to me after the hearing to
tell me they had my cartoons plastered all over the wall. When—the first
day of the hearings here when—I sat in the thing drawing a cartoon and
drew the—it was at that time, Men In—Men In Black was a
big movie so I parodied the movie poster and had Men in Denial across
the top and had the two top guys in the nuclear agency drawn. And one of
them was just—just rather rotund. He came up looking over my shoulder.
The judges came, everybody stopped to gather around the cartoon in the
courtroom during breaks. And all the secretaries from this—the low level
agency in Austin showed up. Some of them wanted signed versions of the
cartoons. They told me they had the cartoons all over their offices. You
can bet they loved seeing their stuffed shirt bosses being parodied
there.
DT: Do you think that making people laugh changes their minds?
0:07:56 - 2145
GO: Changes the other side’s minds? That’s hard to say.
You—you can—people’s minds do—do change. I went to a work shop in
Vermont that was about nuclear whistle blowers and those were—were
nuclear engineers, safety engineers, guys who—whose whole education was
based around atomic power, who believed that it could be built safely.
But they found things that—that were improperly built. They found
something that wasn’t to the—what wasn’t safe in their estimation. They
reported it and were squelched and when they went around channels, their
careers were trashed. And most of them had stories of—of losing
families, being pariahs in their town, relatives cutting them off. Some
people go through—go through incredible things to do what they think is
right. So those people’s minds changed. They didn’t perhaps decide that
nuclear power was unsafe, but they certainly made a decision about
nuclear power as it exists now, i.e., the low bidder form of nuclear
power could be safer.
DT: I hope that your work encourages people to change their
mind. I had one last question and then maybe we can ask you to play some
music, and that’s, I understood that you have a place out in Terlingua
Ranch, the Vista Huevo…
0:09:35 - 2145
GO: Huevo Vista.
DT: Huevo Vista. Excuse me. I was wondering if you could tell
me about that place and what appeals to you about that spot in the
outdoors or perhaps other spots, you’ve traveled so much, maybe there
are other ones.
0:09:48 - 2145
GO: Oh, there are many places. Of course, I love Big Bend out
here, both the state park and the national park. And this is, Terlingua
Ranch is a big, big subdivided ranch. It’s two hundred thousand acres
north and west of Big Bend National Park. And I’m lucky enough to be a
partner with another guy in—in eighty acres, way out at the western most
extremity, a real—real isolated place. I’m lucky because it’s a hundred
miles from here and I don’t drive a car so it’s—it’s quite a bicycle
ride down there. The other guy is the one who found it. He was a—he was
a biologist and geologist teaching out here and he—he identified a
really spectacular piece of country that has Tenahas, which are water
holes, all around it. Some—some gorgeous rock formations and canyons and
a lovely ridge with about a three hundred degree view. And there’s—in
that area, the—the cattle aren’t being run on the ranches next door so
there are no fences, it’s open land, which is a treat here in Texas
where have an awful lot of fences. So I get down there when I can find a
way to go there since I don’t—I have poor vision and don’t—have never
driven a car.
DT: Tell me about that, as somebody who has poor vision, how
do you experience the outdoors?
0:11:14 - 2145
GO: Well, the outdoors…
DT: The outdoors has smells and sounds…
0:11:17 - 2145
GO: Certainly. All those things matter. That’s one of the big
things in Big Bend that it can be—the nearest motor can be a long, long
way away. At my place, you have to climb the highest ridge above it to
look to see the glow of a light from behind a mou—a mountain some miles
away. That’s the—there’s no light anywhere around. It’s very dark at
night and it’s very quiet, until the occasional plane passes. It’s a
beautiful place.
DT: Thanks for telling us about it. Can we break and…
0:11:57 - 2145
GO: Okay. Well this one—just so—I’ll do a couple that I pick
and then a couple that I strum so that the levels will at least be
consistent. This one is, instead of being about any particular
environmental thing, and many of those are parodies, some of them are
tunes you’ll know that I’ve adapted to fit an issue. This one is just so
standard you’ll think you’ve heard it before. But, and—and I don’t think
any of my songs have titles. So anyway, here’s a—here’s one from I think
last year.
(Playing music)
End of reel 2145
End of interview with Gary Oliver
|
